Monday, June 16, 2014

But what independence?

Posted by Belarmino Saguing
Rome, Italy 16 June 2014


Ceremonies of Procamation of Philippine Independence, Luneta Park, July 4, 1946 (downloaded Photo)

On July 4, America’s own Independence Day, the Philippine Islands became, by the grace of Wall Street, the habitat of a “free, independent nation.” That is what the words say in the Tydings-McDuffie Act passed by the US Congress in 1934 and now put into effect. A 10-year period of transition, of “political tutelage“ in the art of self-government, will come to a close. The Philippine Commonwealth will become the Philippine Republic. The US high commissioner packed his bags and depart. The Stars and Stripes was be ceremoniously lowered and the Philippine flag just as ceremoniously hoisted. The bands will play. The crowds cheered. Wall Street’s government, with a cynical smirk, have demonstrated its “sincere devotion” to the cause of freedom and independence for all the peoples of the world, its moral superiority over the older empires which hold their colonial subjects in bondage without promise or hope of freedom.

Underneath all the pageantry and fanfare, and lurking behind the formal grant of independence, is the ugly fact of continuing and even tighter domination of the Philippines by Wall Street and its government. Behind the façade of supposed sovereignty stands the reality of colonial servitude. Only the outward political form is being changed. From a colony, the Philippines are being converted merely into a semi-colony.

Let us take a look at the hard realities. As a condition of putting into force the act of independence on the date specified in 1934, the US government last year demanded the right to establish its own military bases in the Philippines and to maintain them in perpetuity. Navy Secretary Forrestal stated that the US will “continue to bear responsibility for the security of the Philippines, and will have to have bases, and strategic areas supporting those bases, to carry out that responsibility.” Sergio Osmena, the former Philippine president, readily acceded to this “request.” His successor, Manuel Roxas, stands by the commitment. The “independent” Philippine Republic must permit the US to establish air, ground and naval bases in the Islands wherever the US Joint Chiefs of Staff deem them necessary. A treaty specifying locations, facilities, transit rights and personnel is to be negotiated between the US and the Philippine Republic after July 4. More accurately, Washington will draw up a document and Roxas will sign on the dotted line as directed. The Philippines will thus be brought under more extensive American military control than at any time during the preceding half-century of US rule.

The reality is as stark as in the realm of military affairs. The Philippine Republic was  compelled, by treaty with the US, to grant extensive rights to American capital and American business. By way of return, the Philippines are to receive from the US $625,000,000 as aid in reconstruction, plus the privilege of staying inside US tariff walls for another 28 years. The Filipinos were not to be permitted, however, to spend the “grant-in-aid” as they wish. Materials and technical services are to come largely from the US Personnel of US agencies were assigned to the Philippines for planning and administering reconstruction. Moreover, none of the money will become available until the Philippine Government accepts the provisions of the Philippine Trade Act of 1946. This act provides that Philippine exports to the US shall continue to be duty free until 1954. During the 20 years thereafter, or until 1974, exports to the US are to be subject to a progressively increasing tariff until, by 1974, US trade with the Philippines is on the same basis as trade between the US and other countries. In addition, Philippine exports of certain items are to stay within volume quotas during this period.

However, stiff conditions are attached to the 28-year tariff postponement, which was ostensibly intended to give the Islands time for economic recovery and an opportunity to adjust toward the day when they will be outside US tariff walls. The Filipinos were required to amend their constitution so as to permit American businessmen and American capital to enter the Philippines on the same terms and with the same rights as Filipino businessmen and capital. Moreover, Philippine exports limited by quotas are to be allocated, as the US may specify, among Philippine exporters (mostly American) who were in business before the war. Finally, the Philippine currency unit, the peso, is to be pegged to the US dollar. The Wall Street carpet-baggers thus established a highly favorable position for themselves as investors and traders, and with constitutional guarantees at that. It is not difficult to foresee a period of unbridled economic swashbuckling by these dollar-greedy hogs, who under the guise of granting independence werere in reality fastening more firmly the shackles of colonial exploitation on the mass of poverty-stricken Filipinos. On a greater scale than ever, the Islands’ riches will be siphoned off by these parasites. All possibility of a rounded economic growth will be stultified, as it was in the past, and development tailored to the specifications of Wall Street. The Philipines will remain a collection of plantations, with a few factories processing profitable export crops. The economy will remain backward, the people poor.

As during the post-Aguinaldo regime and the Commonwealth periods, the American imperialists were joined with the native Filipino exploiters, the hacienderos or landed capitalists, in robbing and oppressing the overwhelming mass of downtrodden taos or farmers. It is these native exploiters that the Roxas administration represents. The native exploiters are only too eager to be the junior partners of American imperialism. They shouted loudly for Philippine independence all through the years, only in order to retain the leadership and control of the genuine independence movement of the masses. But the kind of “independence” they sought, the only kind of “independence” they really want, is that which is to be formally consummated this July 4.

These wealthy Filipino parasites collaborated with the Japanese imperialists, who protected them and their estates and moneybags from the wrath of the landless tao. When Japan was defeated the taos, long in revolt, rose up in angry rebellion. A tremendous mass movement, still powerful, threatens to topple the whole system of landlord parasitism. The agrarian movement represented by the Hukbalahaps has the hucienderos trembling on the great estates. They are glad to have at their elbow a powerful ally and guardian to help them preserve “law and order.” For this they have sold out the independence movement, become parties to a brazen fraud, and turned the Philippines over, once more, to Wall Street. Roxas and his government are more than willing to serve as a political façade behind which Wall Street will share with them the exploitation of the Philippines, in the same way that the Indian bourgeoisie and the Indian princes, who have accepted the latest British plan, are content to share in the continued despoliation of India by British imperialism. It costs Wall Street little to exalt the Filipino bourgeoisie, to give them “face,” by a formal grant of independence which is empty of real content except continued colonial servitude and poverty for the mass of the people.

The fake independence be given to the Philippines, quite apart from its local significance, was in the nature of a world gesture by American imperialism. The global economic needs of this swollen Colossus require it to smash the colonial monopolies of the older imperialist states. It must break into these CIOEd markets. Already during the war it had begun to elbow its way in. Today these colonial lands are all in revolt against the imperialist violators. Is this not, then, a propitious time to plant in the minds of the colonial bourgeoisie of India, for instance, the idea that American imperialism is liberal and benevolent as compared with British imperialism, which is reactionary and violent? “Look! – haven’t we given the Philippines their independence, as we promised we would?” The day may not be far distant when the native Indian exploiters will be looking for a more “generous patron.” And what more “generous patron” could be found than Wall Street? It is not important whichever date they choose to celebrate this 'independence', it is still a fake independence

The journalistic liberals, those doughty defenders of anything vile and reactionary so long as it parades in liberal vestments, have already extolled Philippine “independence” as a “model” of benevolent political enterprise, as living proof that the United States “keeps its word” (in contrast, for example, with perfidious England), as a conclusive demonstration that America is not an imperialist power.

One thing is certain: The Filipino masses will not be deceived. For 50 years they have fought for their independence, against Wall Street and against Japanese imperialism. Before that they battled to free themselves from the cruel grip of imperial Spain. The fight must and will go on until genuine freedom and a chance to create a better life for the masses is assured.

Keep the struggles against US Imperialism. The Katipunan revolution for true freedom and genuine independence lives on in the hearts of the freedom loving Filipino masses.

Long live the Katipunan revolution!

Down with US and Filipino capitalist parasites!

Long live Andres Bonifacio’s Sovereign Republic of Tagalog!!!

Dismantle the fake Tuta government of the Philippines


Struggle for real liberty AND Genuine Democracy in the truly independent Philppines!!!


Source: wikipedia
















No comments:

Post a Comment