Monday, December 2, 2013

RAPPLER | NATION | Andres Bonifacio: Myths, trivia, execution



BY JEE Y. GERONIMO
POSTED ON 11/30/2013 11:09 AM  | UPDATED 11/30/2013 5:31 PM
18
Comments
3K
0
LinkedIn
0
Pinterest
3K
Share
MANILA, Philippines – Whether you think he should be the country’s official national hero or not, knowing more about Andres Bonifacio won’t hurt. Consider it your gift to the Supremo of Katipunan – it’s his 150th birthday, after all.
Rappler compiled 10 facts about Bonifacio: myths we should clarify, trivia we can refresh our memory with, and of course, his execution – one of the most controversial deaths in Philippine history.

1. Bonifacio was a versatile, young worker
The young Bonifacio, out of necessity, started beefing up his resumé at an early age after his parents died of tuberculosis. As the new head of the family, he made walking canes and paper fans with his brothers and sisters at night, selling them at premium prices in Manila’s busy streets in the morning.
He also took on other jobs to sustain them:
  • bodegero (warehouse keeper) in a mosaic tile factory
  • clerk-messenger for the English firm J.M. Fleming and Company
  • maker of attractive posters for companies such as clothes dealers (he had a good penmanship)
  • bodegero and supply clerk, then promoted as a sales agent at the German firm Carlos Fressel & Company
  • Moro-moro performer
2. Is the hero of the masses really poor?
Before Erap, there was Bonifacio – a true leader of the masses. But the title does not mean he was dirt-poor, when his patrons were the rich who bought his canes and fans.
Bonifacio and his siblings rose to lower middle class status after their parents’ death, and the hero even married his second wife Gregoria de Jesus, who belonged to a lower middle class family.
In the two firms he was employed in, Bonifacio was also promoted. According to historian Michael “Xiao” Chua, the hero’s monthly salary then is equivalent to P18,000 today.
3. Who dared calling him the 'Bobong Supremo'?
Because he was orphaned and had to support his siblings at a young age, he was often called uneducated. But according to scholars, he studied in Guillermo Osmeña’s school in Cebu, and reached what is now second year high school.
His employer, Doña Elvira Prysler, even remembered Bonifacio holding a book every lunch time. What does a national hero read? See for yourself:
  • books by Alexander Dumas, a French writer known for his adventurous historical novels
  • Les Miserables (Victor Hugo)
  • The Wandering Jew (Eugene Sue)
  • The Ruins of Palmyra: Meditations on the Revolution of the Empire
  • The Holy Bible
  • Religion Within the Reach of All
  • Lives of the Presidents of the United States
  • Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo (Jose Rizal)
  • History of the French Revolution
  • law (international law, civil code, penal code) and medical books
“Shutting a book, he would announce to Nonay (Espiridiona) that he had just completed a course in law or in medicine,” Sylvia Mendez Ventura wrote.

4. Undress Bonifacio: Why the camisa de chino?
You know what they say: Picture or it didn’t happen.
The same may be said of what the national hero really looks like. Most monuments and history books like dressing him up in a camisa de chino, with a red handkerchief around the neck and a bolo in one hand. But in his only surviving photograph, Bonifacio is wearing what looks like a coat and tie.
Historian Isagani Medina also wrote about how Bonifacio dressed neatly and well in spite of his meager resources, and of his penchant for carrying an umbrella regardless of the weather.

5. Promising start: Bonifacio’s Katipunan name
It was a secret society after all. The final test to be a Katipunero was a blood compact (sandugo) reminiscent of the first one Filipinos shared with the Spaniards early in history. It was the Katipunan’s way of capturing the narrative from the “traitors” and making brotherhood their own.
But the twist to the Katipunan’s sandugo was that they wrote their oath in their own blood. After this, they chose a symbolic name for themselves. Quite interesting was the Supremo’s choice of name, and quite telling too, for a leader of a hopeful nation: MAYPAG-ASA.

6. Bonifacio picked up a pen too
National Artist and Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino chair Virgilio Almario argued that Bonifacio is a better writer than Rizal because his works – dubbed “akdang Katipunero” – were more easy to grasp for the masses than the writings of the ilustrados. (READ: His Excellency, President Andres Bonifacio?)
Perhaps the best example of this is Bonifacio's “Pag-ibig sa Tinubuang Bayan (Love of Fatherland),” a compelling poem about one's love for the nation – an ideology at the very heart of the revolution.
“Aling pag-ibig pa ang hihigit kaya / Sa pagkadalisay at pagkadakila / Gaya ng pag-ibig sa Tinubuang lupa? / Aling pag-ibig pa? Wala na nga, wala.”
He also wrote other pieces like “Ang Dapat Mabatid ng Mga Tagalog (What the Filipinos Should Know)” and “Tapunan ng Lingap (Care a Little)."


7. Is Rizal Bonifacio’s hero?
There’s no doubt Bonifacio read Rizal’s work, considering how widely-read the books were at the time. But to say Bonifacio was merely inspired by Rizal to revolt is only half the truth, Chua said.
“If you look at it, when Bonifacio created the Katipunan, it was so different from what the Ilustrados are thinking...Bonifacio had a clear concept of who we are as a people, and I'm sorry to say, even more than Rizal.”
In Bonifacio’s Katipunan...
  • They revived the indigenous practices of the Filipinos (blood compact or sandugo, a sign of brotherhood)
  • Love is the key to his concept of nationhood
  • Freedom is not a mere declaration of independence but a result of complete rest coming from goodness within
  • They existed not only to fight Spaniards, but also to uphold righteousness and the unity of Filipinos
8. The tragedies and struggles of 1896
The year 1896 was so tough for Bonifacio that "A Series of Unfortunate Events" may actually pale in comparison:
Holy Week: The nipa-roofed house of Bonifacio and his wife Gregoria de Jesus (Katipunan name: Lakangbini or Lakambini) in Sta. Cruz was burned down during the Holy Week of 1896
Shortly after the loss of their home: Their baby boy Andres died of smallpox
August 19: Katipunan was discovered after Teodoro Patiño, an unhappy member of the Katipunan, told Fr Mariano Gil about the secret society. Many Filipinos were arrested, jailed, and shot as a result. Andres and Gregoria went into hiding.
August 23: Bonifacio, with other Katipunan leaders, met in Pugadlawin, tore up their cedulas (residence tax papers) and vowed to fight the Spaniards down to the last man.
August 30: The first battle of the Philippine Revolution commenced, led by Andres Bonifacio and his best friend Emilio Jacinto. Out of their 800-man army, more than 150 Katipuneros died and another 200 were captured.
9. Not your hot-tempered kind of hero
There has been a longstanding debate on who our national hero really should be, with supporters of Rizal arguing that Bonifacio revolted through violent means when their hero was a peace-loving man. It doesn’t help Bonifacio’s image either that he pointed a gun at Daniel Tirona during the Tejeros Convention.
But context is always important, Chua said. At that time, Bonifacio drew his gun to challenge Tirona to a duel – what Chua called "defending [one's] honor with blood" – after Tirona called him an uneducated man.
And if his war strategy during the 1896 Battle of Manila is any indication, it supports accounts that he doesn’t attack aimlessly. E. R. Azicate wrote in Filipino: “Bonifacio had great capacity as a military leader if the basis is planning, preparing, coordinating, and executing the game plan. In short, he is good at strategy and tactics.”


10. What were the last scenes leading to Bonifacio’s death? Choose your own ending.
On April 26, 1897, Bonifacio was arrested. Tried by a military court in Maragondon, Cavite, for only 12 days, he was charged with treason for trying to overthrow Emilio Aguinaldo and his government.
As if his trial was not controversial enough, Ambeth Ocampo even mentioned in his book, “Bones of Contention,” what he called an “ugly bit of history” in the narrative: the supposed rape of Gregoria de Jesus:
“Bonifacio in his testimony told the court that Col. Yntong was forcing his wife into an empty house ‘sa talagang kilos na ilugso ang kapurihan’ but this was averted when the other officers objected. Later in Indang, Col. Yntong attempted to rape Aling Oryang again but this time, Bonifacio pleaded with Tomas Mascardo who mercifully intervened...It was possible that one of the motives for raping Aling Oryang was that it would further humiliate Bonifacio.”
Yntong is Col. Agapito Bonzon, head of the officers sent by the new government to arrest Bonifacio.
Bonifacio and his brother Procopio were sentenced to death on May 8, 1897, supposedly on Aguinaldo's orders. Two days after, they were brought to Mt Nagpatong, where Gen Lazaro Makapagal carried out the sentence and shot the brothers. This is the widely-accepted ending to the life of the Father of the Philippine Revolution.
That is, until the 1950s and 1960s, when Ocampo said another narrative from Guillermo Masangkay, one of the first members of the Katipunan, claimed Bonifacio was hacked to death with bolos.
“As they did not want to waste precious ammunition they decided to use bladed weapons.” 
– with research by Buena Bernal and Nigel Tan/Rappler.com



Pinoy Weekly | Ika-150 kaarawan ng Supremo, 150 taon ng paglaban


Posted: 30 Nov 2013 09:51 PM PST

Nagmartsa ang iba't-ibang progresibong grupo bilang paggunita sa ika-150 kaarawan ni Gat Andres Bonifacio.  (Macky Macaspac)Nagmartsa ang iba’t-ibang progresibong grupo bilang paggunita sa ika-150 kaarawan ni Gat Andres Bonifacio. (Macky Macaspac)



Libu-libong manggagawa, magsasaka at iba pang sektor ng lipunan ang nagprotesta noong Nobyembre 30, bilang paggunita sa ika-150 anibersaryo ng kapanganakan ni Gat Andres Bonifacio, ang Supremo ng Kagalang-galangan, Kataas-taasang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan (KKK).

Sa Kamaynilaan, nagdaos ng programa ang iba’t ibang sektor sa Welcome Rotonda sa Quezon City at sa Liwasang Bonifacio sa Maynila bago tumulak patungo sa Mendiola.


Paggunita sa laban ni Bonifacio

Isang daan at limampung taon ang nagdaan matapos ang Himagsikan ng 1896, naniniwala ang mga nagprotesta na hindi pa tapos ang laban na sinimulan ng Supremo. Ang himagsikan laban sa dayuhang kontrol, pyudalismo at paghahari ng iilan sa pamahalaan ay nariyan pa rin.

Ayon kay Bong Labog, tagapangulo ng Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU), nagprotesta ang mga manggagawa dahil ang pinakamagandang paraan sa paggunita sa kaarawan ni Bonifacio ay labanan ang isang rehimen na laging inuuna ang interes nito kaysa sa kapakanan ng mga Pilipino.

Sa panayam ng Pinoy Weekly, sinabi ni Labog na kasama sa kanilang protesta ang hindi makabuluhang pagtugon ng gobyerno sa naganap na pananalasa ng bagyong Yolanda.

“Napakaraming kababayan natin ang namatay, 5,000 mahigit sa kasalukuyan, at mukhang madadagdagan pa. At hindi talaga epektibo ang pamimigay ng relief assistance. Ito yung tinutuligsa ng mga raliyista ngayong hapon na ito mula sa Liwasang Bonifacio, Welcome Rotonda, sa harap ng UST at ngayon sa Mendiola,” paliwanag ni Labog.

Sinabi pa ng lider-manggagawa na bahagi ito sa pagsasabuhay sa makabayan, matapang  at anti-kolonyal na paninidigang rebolusyonaryo ni Gat Andres Bonifacio.

“Kaya nagpapatuloy ang laban na ito sa pagsasamantala ng imperyalismo, matinding pyudalismo at burukarata-kapitalismo sa ating bayan. Ito pa rin yung batayang suliranin ng mga mamamayan na inumpisahan ni Bonifacio. Ibig lang sabihin nito na hindi pa lubos na malaya ang ating Inang Bayan, sabi pa ni Labog.

Idinagdag ni Labog na ang kasalukuyang rehimeng US-Aquino ay hindi talaga tumutugon sa mga batayang serbisyo at pangangailangan ng mga sektor ng bayan. Kaya ang mga ganitong kilos protesta ay magpapatuloy — hindi ito ang katapusan ng mga pagtitipun-tipon ng iba’t ibang sektor — kundi magiging tuloy-tuloy at magsisilbing inspirasyon ang diwa ni Andres Bonifacio  hanggang sa makamit ang tunay na pambansang kalayaan at demokrasya, aniya.

“Kung buhay si Bonifacio, tiyak na maghihimagsik din siya sa ganitong kalagayan,” sabi ni Labog.

Para naman kay Rep. Fernando Hicap ng Anakpawis party-list, napakahalagang gunitain ang kaarawan ni Andres Bonifacio para sa mga manggagawa, magsasaka, mangingisda at iba pang inaaping sektor dahil sa kanyang dakilang ambag para sa patuloy na pagtangkilik at pagtaguyod sa kanyang simulain para sa tunay na kalayaan laban sa mapang-api at mapagsamantalang sistema ng reaksyunaryong gobyerno at mga imperyalistang bansa sa ating bayan.

“Lalo ngayong tumitindi ang panunupil sa ating bayan, mas masahol pa sa panahon ng mga kolonyalistang Espanyol. Masahol ang kalagayan ng paggawa at ang mga mamamayan ay nasasadlak sa matinding kagutuman dahil hindi nakasasapat ang kanilang kinikita sa araw-araw,” ani Hicap.

“Sa uring magsasaka, nariyan pa rin ang kawalan at kakulangan ng lupang sinasaka. Ang pakinabang ay nasa ilang panginoong maylupa pa rin. Nariyan ang mga transnasyunal na korporasyon na kinakandili naman ng administrasyong Aquino sa pamamagitan ng mga programa at polisiya tulad ng pagpapalit-gamit sa lupa para sa mga development plan kuno at pagpapalit-tanim. Sa halip na palay at mais, na siyang kinakain ng mga mamamayan, itinatanim ang mga high value crop na mas pinakikinabangan ng malalaking korporasyon,” dagdag niya pa.

Sa pangisdaan naman, nariyan ang kumbersyon ng mga pangisdaan, mga eco-tourism project, industrial zone, aquaculture, na laganap sa mga dagat at lawa.

Sa sektor ng Migrante, sinabi ni Garry Martinez, tagapangulo ng Migrante na marami sa mga overseas Filipino workers (OFW) ang naniniwala at sumasama sa pakikibaka sa modernong panahon.

“Ipinakikita ng mga kilusang migrante sa loob at labas ng bansa ang kanilang determinasyon para sa tunay na pagpapalaya at pagbabago sa sistema dito sa ating bansa. Kitang-kita naman kung gaano na ito kabulok, lantad na lantad na. Ang malinaw sa mga organisasyon ng mga migrante sa ibayong dagat ay ang pagkakaroon ng diwang palaban. Undocumented sila pero kayang magrali, kayang maggiit sa host government, kayang tumindig sa pambansang isyu na nangyayari sa kasalukuyan,” sabi pa niya.


Buhay na diwa

“Sadyang buhay ang diwa ni Bonifacio, ang isang kongkretong ebidensiya ay ang bilang ng dumalo sa kilos protesta na umabot sa 15,000 na mga manggagawa at batayang sektor. Lalo pa’t ipinangangalandakan ng gobyernong ito na may ‘daang matuwid’ pero saksi tayo sa nagaganap na kaliwa’t kanang korapsiyon sa ating bayan. Walang tunay na mahalagang pagbabagong nagaganap sa araw-araw na pamumuhay ng mga ordinaryong mamamayan sa ating bayan,” sabi ni Labog.

Sa kasaysayan, nariyan ang diwa ng paglaban ng mamamayang Pilipino. Kaya nga ang nakaraang mga administrasyon hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay gumagamit ng dahas para pigilan ang mga paglabang ito.

“Nariyan ang pakikibaka sa mga pagawaan, kabukiran, sa mga demolisyon at maging sa mga paraalan. Ipinapakita lamang nito na lumalaban ang masang anakpawis sa pamamagitan ng sama-samang pagkilos. Kaya dapat nating alalahanin na ang pakikibakang ito para sa panlipunang pagbabago ay ang pinakatamang porma para sa tuluyang paglaya ng mamamayang Pilipino,” ayon naman kay Hicap.

Para naman kay Martinez, tuloy-tuloy ang pakikibaka. “Ang nagbabago lang kasi ay kung sino ang nakapuwesto, sino ang nagmamaniobra. Noon ay direkta tayong kolonya, ngayon, kahit hindi direktang kolonya, kitang-kita ang kontrol ng dayuhan sa usaping pang-ekonomiya, militar at kahit sa kultura. At ito ang batayan nina Bonifacio sa paglaban, ito pa rin ang pakikibaka natin ngayon para tuluyan tayong lumaya,” pagwawakas ni Martinez.


Nakasuot Katipunero ang ilang miyembro ng KMU, (Macky Macaspac)Nakasuot Katipunero ang ilang miyembro ng KMU, (Macky Macaspac)

 Malakas ang panawagang baguhin ang sistemang umiiral mula noong panahon ni Gat Andres Bonifacio. (Pher Pasion)Malakas ang panawagang baguhin ang sistemang umiiral mula noong panahon ni Gat Andres Bonifacio. (Pher Pasion)

Kinondena ng grupong Migrante ang kapabayaan ng gobyernong Aquino sa mga biktima ng bagyong Yolanda. (Jaze Marco)Kinondena ng grupong Migrante ang kapabayaan ng gobyernong Aquino sa mga biktima ng bagyong Yolanda. (Jaze Marco)
Kuha ni Macky MacaspacKuha ni Macky Macaspac
Kuha ni Pher PasionKuha ni Pher Pasion

Ang effigy ni Pangulong Aquino na tinaguriang Pork Barrel King at Disaster King. (Jaze Marco)Ang effigy ni Pangulong Aquino na tinaguriang Pork Barrel King at Disaster King. (Jaze Marco)
Kuha ni Macky MacaspacKuha ni Macky Macaspac
Paglalarawan ng isang aktibista ang mahalagang papel ng mga kababaihan sa kilusang pagbabago, tulad ni Gregoria de Jesus ang Lakambini ng Katipunan. (Macky Macaspac)Paglalarawan ng isang aktibista sa mahalagang papel ng mga kababaihan sa kilusang pagbabago, tulad ni Gregoria de Jesus ang Lakambini ng Katipunan. (Macky Macaspac)
Pahayag ng mga rebolusyonaryong grupo ng mga manggagawa at kababaihan.  (MAcky Macaspac)Pahayag ng mga rebolusyonaryong grupo ng mga manggagawa at kababaihan. (Macky Macaspac)
Teksto ni: Soliman Santos, Mga larawan kuha nina: Macky Macaspac, Pher Pasion at Jaze Marco

Sunday, December 1, 2013

DAVAO TODAY | Environment | Ateneo de Davao pushes climate change awareness, but dean okays coal energy




by EARL O. CONDEZA
Davao Today
DAVAO CITY — Ateneo de Davao University (AdDU) is planning a climate change awareness campaign among vulnerable sectors in the city, but a dean’s stand on the coal-fired power plant, a top cause of climate change, is questioned by an environment group.
Maria Lourdesita Chan, chair of the University Research Council, said in a press conference early this week, the AdDU campaign on climate change awareness was prompted by lessons from Typhoon Pablo that struck Davao Region last year and the recent Typhoon Yolanda that leveled Eastern Visayas.
She said this campaign is designed to raise understanding on climate change and disaster preparedness among communities in the city that are most vulnerable to typhoons, floods and other disasters, through its students who will be sent to vulnerable communities.
Part of its project, Chan said, is a proposed production of a disaster survival kit which consists of a solar lamp, solar charger for mobile phones, designed to sustain people for 72 hours. It also includes a water purifier and energy food processor.
Chan said they asked the City Council to support the production of this kit, which the council said will be sourced from public-private partnership (PPP).
While this campaign points out coal energy as a major threat to climate and the abrupt change in weather, the university’s Dean of Arts and Sciences and astrophysicist, Fr. Daniel Mc Namara, however, considers coal-fired power plant “okay” for the “short term” to meet the city’s power demand.
“Coal is not the greatest answer but maybe in a short term, it has to be. If the plant is ready for replacement, let’s say 10 to 15 years from now, (we’ll replace) it with other renewable energy, whatever it is going to be,” he said.
Mc Namara said that considering the country has the highest energy cost in Asia, coal could provide cheaper costs than other renewable energy sources.
“We know that the Philippines has the highest energy cost (in Asia). (Coal) is much cheaper than solar (energy) and other renewable energy sources,” he said.
But Doctor Jean Lindo, spokesperson of the Network Opposed to Coal (NO TO COAL) said coal energy is not cheap in the long term with its effect on people’s health.
“Coal-fired power plants maybe cheap, but its effect to health, and economic needs of the people around the plant will be affected. Health problems that we could have for its 10 to 15 years of operation is not cheap.”
“And besides, no coal-fired power plant will operate for just a decade,” she added.
Lindo also said social costs such as livelihood of communities occupied by the plant will be affected.
“Although (the plant) will provide jobs, people living around the plant will be relocated, their livelihood will be affected, (specially) those who are working along the shore,” she said.
The coal-fired power plant located in Toril is owned by the Aboitiz Power Corp.’s subsidiary Therma South, and is projected to operate in 2015.
The global environment group Greenpeace said “coal energy (is) the single greatest threat facing our climate” and “the biggest source of man-made CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions.”
CO2 emission, according to the group, heats up our atmosphere and affects the climate.
Lindo said “uniting and consulting people will help minimize climate change, and explore other renewable energy. It will also create more jobs, green jobs.”
Another  environment advocate, Juland Suazo of Panalipdan (Defend) Southern Mindanao, challenged AdDU to hold “grassroots-based climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction.”
“For instance, how about architecture students and architects helping design typhoon-resilient houses for lumads, peasants and workers? How about engineering students or engineers helping in developing a community-based, off-the-grid renewable energy system?” he asked. (Earl O. Condeza, davaotoday.com)

DAVAO TODAY | History | Bonifacio as national hero pushed



Posted by: DAVAO TODAY Posted date: December 02, 2013 In: Headline, History 




Youth activist draws inspiration from Bonifacio’s legacy. to fight for nationalism and freedom (davaotoday.com photo by Medel V. Hernani)

by DAVAO TODAY



On the 150th birthday of the Katipunan leader Andres Bonifacio, a bill was filed in Congress to declare him as national hero.
Bayan Muna Partylist Representatives Neri Colmenares and Carlos Isagani Zarate filed this bill in the House of Representatives Thursday, saying a need for a national symbol to “represent patriotism, nationalism and resolve to fight against any foreign intervention and control” can be found in Bonifacio’s legacy.
The bill raised again the debate between Bonifacio and Dr. Jose Rizal — the propagandist who inspired the revolution — as to who should be declared the national hero.
“It has long been a debate in schools and other venues of learning, and even among ordinary Filipinos, who between Rizal and Bonifacio must the title National Hero attach. A lot has also been said in favor or against both heroes. It is also a fact that both are heroes in their own respective right,” Bayan Muna’s resolution noted.
The bill noted there has been no law declaring a national hero for the country.
A National Heroes Committee was created in 1993 through Executive Order No. 75 to evaluate and recommend Filipino national heroes, but failed to come up with a choice.
“Some opinions say that deciding on a name might spur debates as to some historical controversies about the lives of our heroes,” the bill said.
Bonifacio Day on November 30 was declared a national holiday by the Philippine Legislature on February 16, 1921 through Act No. 2964 to commemorate the Katipunero’s birthday. While another legislation, Act No. 2760 in 1918 authorized the erection of a monument in memory of Bonifacio.
Rizal’s day of execution, December 30 was declared a day of national mourning by General Emilio Aguinaldo on December 20, 1898.
Bayan Muna said Rizal, through his two novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, was able to inspire the middle class to fight for reforms in society.
“It is true that Jose Rizal through his writings was able to put across the need for changes in the country that was dominated by Spanish colonial power. His writings influenced intellectuals who actively participated in the fight for reforms in society”.
But the bill noted that “Andres Bonifacio, on the other hand, was an intellectual impassioned by the need to change the oppressive and exploitative system not merely by writing about it but also by acting on it. Thus he organized the Katipunero’s KKK.”
Bayan Muna said the difference between Bonifacio and Rizal “lies in the ability of Bonifacio to translate Rizal’s writings into a language understandable to the Filipino masses and to transform and develop them into practice. Because of his actual participation in the KKK, Bonifacio was able to organize and mobilize thousands of Katipuneros in a revolution that ended the regime of Spanish Colonization and led towards a Filipino nation’s independence.”
“Bonifacio’s heroism inspires in us the patriotism and nationalism that is resolute and uncompromising which the people and especially the youth must learn and imbibe,” the partylist added.
Former Kabataan Parytlist Representative Raymond Palatino, in his online column in Bulatlat.com, also asserted Bonifacio’s legacy in the 1898 revolution is nothing to be glossed over.
Citing historical records, Palatino said historians recognized Bonfiacio as the country’s first president.
“Some historians believe that the Katipunan had become a de facto open government after August 1896. John Taylor, custodian of the Philippine Insurgent Records, described Bonifacio’s supreme council as the ‘insurgent government of the Philippines.’ An article in the 1897 issue of La Illustracion Espanola y Americana referred to Bonifacio as Presidente de la Republika Tagala,” Palatino wrote.
Palatino also added Bonifacio was recognized by another Asian independence hero for his feats at the same level as Rizal.
“It is not only Rizal who is considered the ‘pride of the Malay race’. Tan Malaka, one of Indonesia’s national heroes and founding leaders, recognized the heroism of both Rizal and Bonifacio,” he said.
“He specifically cited the revolutionary legacy of Bonifacio and his influence in sparking the anti-colonial movements across Southeast Asia. Professor Ramon Guillermo translated this quote from Tan Malaka: “Si Bonifacio ang pinakauna, hindi lamang sa Pilipinas, kundi sa buong Indonesia, oo, sa buong Asia na nanggaling sa, at edukado bilang, proletaryado, na nag-organisa ng mga proletaryo. (Bonifacio was the first, not only in the Philippines, but in also in Indonesia, yes and the whole of Asia, to come from and be educated as a proletariat [working class] and organized the proletariat),” Palatino noted.
Activists in Davao City held protest actions to commemorate Bonifacio’s 150th birthday and his legacy of nationalism. In the morning, the youth group AnakBayan staged a rally at the Bonifacio Rotunda along Magallanes Street
The Kilusang Mayo Uno honored the proletariat leader with a march from Magsaysay Park to Rizal Park in San Pedro Street. Workers tore a symbolic paper denouncing “anti-worker policies” such as labor-only contract and low wages.
The farmers group Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas also joined the rally. Their spokesperson Pedro Arnado said “just like Bonifacio, the KMP also fight for distribution of land to the tillers from the hacienderos and plantations.”
Members of Gabriela read poems while cultural activists staged a play and dance depicting the Katipunan’s history and the continuing struggles of the Filipinos against American rule.              







 (davaotoday.com)




The Balangiga massacre- the atrocity of US military in the Philippines


In 1901, the U.S. commander at Balangiga on the Island of Samar had sent troops out to destroy crops and grain reserves, to keep such food from flowing into the hands of the insurgents; he had also ordered all males over the age of thirteen, at gun-point, to work at clearing brush and repairing the streets of the town. The people of Balangiga revolted in reaction to their abuse at the hands of the Americans — an American garrison in the town of Balangiga was attacked between 6:20 and 6:45 in the morning of 28 September 1901 by the local population, with the support of the local police chief and members of the insurgency. Fifty-four of the seventy-eight American troops stationed at Balangiga were killed; only four escaped uninjured. The massacre shocked the U.S. public and many newspaper editors noted that it was the worst disaster suffered by the U.S. Army since George Armstrong Custer’s “last stand” at the Little Big Horn in 1876. Brigadier General Jacob Smith was given the task of crushing the resistance on Samar and exacting revenge for the deaths of the American soldiers at Balangiga.

At the beginning of the campaign when officers had gathered at the site of the Balangiga Massacre, Smith told Marine Major Littleton W. T. Waller:

I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States.

Since it was a popular belief among the Americans serving in the Philippines that native males were born with bolos in their hands, Waller asked, “I would like to know the limit of age to respect, sir?”

“Ten years.” Smith said.

“Persons of ten years and older are those designated as being capable of bearing arms?”

“Yes.” Smith confirmed his instructions a second time.


Smith's infamous order - Kill Everyone Over Ten - was the caption in the New York Journal cartoon on May 5, 1902.

Smith would later send Waller a written order “that the interior of Samar must be made a howling wilderness.” However, aware of Smith’s penchant for making outrageous oaths and the extravagance of his language, Waller therefore did not execute Smith’s orders. Instead, Waller applied the rules of civilized warfare and the rules provided under General Orders No. 100 of 1863 dealing with irregular warfare (involving non-uniformed combatants), which stated that if enemy units gave no quarter and became treacherous upon capture, it was lawful to shoot anyone belonging to that captured unit.

Nevertheless, a sustained and widespread massacre of Filipino civilians followed. As a result of Smith’s policies during the four and half month-long campaign, an estimated 15,000 Filipinos died on Samar.



US Army waged 'total war' against Filipino civilians in 1901



In 1899, after the annihilation of the US Army garrison imn Balangiga, Eastern Samar, the US commander in the area gave the order "I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons above 10 years oldkilled."





For most of 1899, the revolutionary leadership had viewed guerrilla warfare strategically only as a tactical option of final recourse, not as a means of operation which better suited their disadvantaged situation. On November 13, 1899, Emilio Aguinaldo decreed that guerrilla war would henceforth be the strategy.

This made American occupation of the Philippine archipelago all the more difficult over the next few years. In fact, during just the first four months of the guerrilla war, the Americans had nearly 500 casualties.

The Philippine Army began staging bloody ambushes and raids, such as the guerrilla victories at Paye, Catubig, Makahambus, Pulang Lupa, Balangiga and Mabitac. At first, it even seemed as if the Filipinos would fight the Americans to a stalemate and force them to withdraw. This was even considered by President McKinley at the beginning of the phase.

The shift to guerrilla warfare drove the US Army to a "total-war" doctrine. Civilians were given identification and forced into concentration camps with a publicly announced deadline after which all persons found outside of camps without identification would be shot on sight. Thousands of civilians died in these camps due to poor conditions.