Sunday, March 18, 2018

ADVICE TO 50-YEARS OLD AND OLDER

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rone, Italy 18 June 2018




Because none of us have many years to live, and we can't take along anything when we go, so we don't have to be too thrifty.

Spend the money that should be spent, enjoy what should be enjoyed, donate what you are able to donate DON'T WORRY about what will happen after we are gone, because when we return to dust, we will feel nothing about praises or criticisms. The time to enjoy the worldly life and your hard earned wealth will be over!

DON'T WORRY too much about your children, for children will have their own destiny and should find their own way. Care for them, love them, give them gifts but also enjoy your money or what is left of it, while you can. Life should have more to it than working from the cradle to the grave!!

50-year olds, don't trade in - your health for wealth, by working yourself to an early grave anymore. Because your money may not be able to buy your health.

When to stop making money, and how much is enough? (A HUNDRED thousand, One million, ten million, One billion?)

Out of thousand hectares of good farm land, you can consume only three quarts (of rice) daily; out of a thousand mansions, you only need eight square meters of space to rest at night.

So, as long as you have enough food and enough money to spend, that is good enough. You should live happily. Every family has its own problems. Just DO NOT COMPARE with others for fame and social status and see whose children are doing better etc., but challenge others for happiness, health, enjoyment, quality of life and longevity.

DON'T WORRY about things that you can't change because it doesn't help and it may spoil your health.

You have to create your own well-being and find your own place of happiness. As long as you are in good mood and good health, think about happy things, do happy things daily and have fun in doing, then you will pass your time happily every day. One day passes WITHOUT happiness, you will lose one day. One day passes WITH happiness and then you gain one day.

In good spirit, sickness will cure; In a happy spirit, sickness will cure faster; in high and happy spirits, sickness will never come.

With good mood, suitable amount of exercise, always in the sun, variety of foods, reasonable amount of vitamin and mineral intake, hopefully you will live another 20 or 30 years of healthy life of pleasure.

ABOVE ALL - Learn to cherish the goodness around... like your spouse and FRIENDS...They all make you feel young and "wanted"... without them you are surely to feel lost !!

Wishing you all the best for the years to come. Please don't forget to share this with all your friends who are 50 plus and every one.

Please do not forget to sharev this with all your friebds who asre 50 years and above.

Friday, March 16, 2018

Activists, Human Rights Defenders and Political Dissenters in the Philippines Tagged in Duterte’s Terror List

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
17.034.2017 Rome, Italy




In the prevailing atmosphere of violence against human rights defenders in the Philippines, the Department of Justice filed a petition on 23 February 2018 seeking to declare the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and the New People’s Army (NPA), the armed wing of the CPP, as terrorist organisations.


However, many of the individuals named in the petition are human rights defenders.  The petition was filed under Republic Act 9372 or the Human Security Act of 2007, otherwise known as the anti-terrorism law.


The petition follows President Rodrigo Duterte’s proclamation that the CPP and NPA are terrorist groups after the collapse of peace negotiations with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) in December last year. In January 2018, he declared that he would pursue left-wing organisations, accusing them of being communist fronts. Within this context, scores of legitimate and peaceful human rights defenders have been labeled as terrorists, making them targets of violence and judicial harassment by associating them with ‘terrorist organisations’ and putting them in grave danger. Many of the human rights defenders are working on indigenous peoples’ rights, lands rights and women’s rights.


Indigenous human rights defenders and others working for the rights of indigenous people are named in the petition, including the current UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Victoria Tauli Corpuz. Ilocos environmental activist Sherwin De Vera is also tagged as a member of CPP as is Elisa Tita Lubi, who is a Karapatan National Executive Committee member and former interim regional coordinator of the Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development. Current and former chairpersons of numerous indigenous organisations are targeted as well as at least 10 indigenous leaders in Northern and Southern Mindanao.


This is the latest in a series of moves to delegitimise and undermine the work of human rights defenders in the Philippines by the Duterte administration. In August 2017, President Duterte called for the police to shoot human rights defenders for “obstructing justice” and for being a part of drug activity. He also threatened human rights organisations with criminal investigations for criticising his war on drugs.
The climate of impunity that prevails in the country, combined with the administration’s encouragement of extra-judicial killings has resulted in the serious deterioration in the situation for human rights defenders in the country. Front Line Defenders recorded the killing of 60 HRDs in the Philippines in 2017, an increase of nearly 100% on the previous year in its Annual Report on Human Rights Defenders at Risk in 2017. Human rights defenders have been regularly accused of violent crimes or of being members of the NPA.  Judicial harassment and criminalisation of human rights defenders remain common, with politicians and private actors using the criminal justice system to silence those who oppose their interests.


The use of the Human Security Act of 2007 to suppress legitimate dissent is a dangerous and underhanded move that definitely worsens the climate of impunity in the Philippines. We deplore this and other acts that intimidate, threaten, harass, target and criminalize persons and defenders who have been working for people’s rights and welfare.


We call on the Philippine government to:
  • Cancel the baseless, malicious and arbitrary Justice Department petition and stop the criminalization of the work of activists, human rights defenders, and political dissenters through the practice of filing trumped-up criminal charges;
  • Stop the labeling of members and leaders of progressive people’s organizations and patriots as “terrorists” both in national and international forums. Stop the threats, intimidation and harassment of human rights defenders;
  • Repeal the Human Security Act of 2007 and all legislative, administrative, executive and judicial acts that violate human rights;
  • Effectively address and immediately prosecute and punish acts of terrorism and human rights violations by agents of the State;
  • End the counter-insurgency program Oplan Kapayapaan which directs and funds State security forces to threaten, harass, and arbitrarily and illegally arrest individuals tagged as “enemies of the State”;
  • Immediately abolish the Inter-Agency Committee on Legal Action (IACLA), a body created by the PNP and the AFP, which further legitimizes and systematizes the political persecution and illegal arrest and detention of rights defenders and activists;
  • Continue the peace talks with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines and comply with its obligations and commitments under the Comprehensive Agreement on the Respect of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL),which includes the right to freedom of thought and expression, freedom of conscience, political beliefs and practices and the right not to be punished or held accountable for the exercise of these rights, and the right to free speech, press, association and assembly; and
  • Adhere to and respect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, and all major Human Rights instruments to which the Philippines is a party and signatory.


We wish to point out that the vision of indigenous peoples’ movements across the world have been to ensure implementation of democratic principles in their countries. We note with alarm that reprisals and attacks against indigenous rights defenders specifically in the Philippines. are increasing.

Monday, March 12, 2018

22 years after the execution on of Flor Contemplacion, OFWs still mirror hope despite the odds.

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy March 12, 2018





We see Flor in every Filipino leaving the country, which according to official estimates have reached a staggering 6,092–plus daily. The number of Filipinos leaving the country to search for greener pastures has been increasing consistently for the past three decades, Poverty and massive joblessness in the country push Filipinos to look for jobs abroad.

Coupled with the government’s labor export policy that reduces people as “mere commodities in the global market,”  many Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW), like Flor, are “forced into dirty, dangerous and demeaning jobs,” with separation from families taking a toll, especially on the youth and children. 


Successive regimes, from Marcos to Duterte, treats migrants like the “proverbial milking cow,” relying on their remittances to hold up the national income figures, levying excessive fees at each stage up to the final taxes as they leave the airport.

Migration today is all about the hope for a better future and an uncaring government. We laud the OFWs, who still mirror hope despite the odds.

We urge the Philippine government to take a more significant actions to save the lives of all Filipino migrant workers who are in death rows, take a more positive steps in the generationn of jobs with humane income in the country to ease the pervading poverty among the workers and peasants, the originating sector of the migrant workers.



SAVE THE LIVES OF OFWS IN DEATH ROWS ABROAD!

END LEP NOW!

CREATE JOBS AT HOME, NOT ABROAD!


STOP TREATING OFWS AD MERE COMMODITIES AND MILKING COWS!



Saturday, March 10, 2018

The common denominators of dictators


The common denominators of dictators




Their ability to sell ‘imaginary enemies’ to the masses.

To ward off the anger of the masses resulting from spiralling prices, wars and hunger, a dictator needs imaginary enemies so that he is not held accountable for all the ills that have gotten hold of the land and the burden of blame falls on the heads of those he paints off as enemies of the state. Imaginary enemies also serve another great purpose, they cement his hold over the country as he is the only person who has what it takes to defeat such devious and calculating groups. The nation rises beyond religious/ethnic lines and stands united in the supreme leader’s fight against such beastly people. There are no other greater loyalties, there's only one idea you bend your knee to, the leader of the nation, and fight his wars, die for him and be hailed as a martyr who went down fighting the enemy. All this war-mongering results from the hysteria that is generated over the imaginary enemies by the state media, if the imaginary enemies are not checked fast enough, they will destroy your land, your culture and enslave your women and your kids. So it is they who become the number one priority for the common folk, healthcare and affordable housing can wait.


    Their affinity for the nation's ostensible glorious past and indulgence in history revisionism.

Almost every failed land and people have had their moments in the past. If there are no moments, then you create them. Lost wars can be brushed as heroic last stands for example. This serves a purpose, since the present and the immediate future of your people stands bleak, you need to provide some sort of plank in time they can look up to and aspire to reach, this keeps the masses satisfied and curbs their anger and hopelessness over the hardships they face on a regular basis. You also re-write history to generate animosity amongst the masses, you insert the ‘imaginary enemies’ and their ‘betrayals’ to the people in the past and exhort your people to avenge the historical wrongs. If there’s present a historical tyrant from the hated group then you highlight him all around to show your people what these beasts are capable of when they hold the sceptres of power in their hands and if they have had a historical hero in their ranks then you pall his achievements with downright lies and pull him off the pedestal people have erected him upon.

Control the past, and you control the future.


Dictators either control the military directly or tie it down in a tight leash. 

The spy agencies, better known as the secret police work a lot harder inside the country than outside in a dictatorship, though this is not a norm but it is noticeable. The last thing a dictator needs is active dissent and since he more concerned about his power than general welfare, the state resources are pumped to erect a home surveillance apparatus.


All Dictators have either had the support of the masses, or the support of the few with some clout (military, business classes, dominant ethnic group, etc.) in the initial stage of their reign. The masses need not be of the majority, but can be on tribal loyalties.
Once their power is consolidated, steps are taken to ensure that it stays so, generally through shows of force, and purges of some of the elites. Some means of surveillance is set up, with an illusion of omniscience and brutality (the latter is real) to discourage dissent and revolts.

All Dictators have either had the support of the masses, or the support of the few with some clout (military, business classes, dominant ethnic group, etc.) in the initial stage of their reign. The masses need not be of the majority, but can be on tribal loyalties.

Once their power is consolidated, steps are taken to ensure that it stays so, generally through shows of force, and purges of some of the elites. Some means of surveillance is set up, with an illusion of omniscience and brutality (the latter is real) to discourage dissent and revolts.

 Dictators spring up in times of instability and dissatisfaction, and the only way they can hope to stay relevant and in power, is by militarization and mass mobilization using the fear of a common enemy of the existential sort, one where survival is at stake, where fear dominates, instead of the more dreary issues of hunger and unemployment.

Such issues are used to justify their reign, and continual support ensues.

The main problem faced by dictators (barring their mortality) is that they can’t hope to stay on, or stay alive unless they do all or some of the above, but that ensures the beginnings of dissatisfaction and future revolt. Only in a few cases has there been a relatively smooth transition of power.


The first victims to any dictatorship apart from political opponents, are intellectuals and free thinkers. A dictator needs a dumbed down citizenry to rule and writers, free thinkers etc often act as a catalyst in building of an intellectual society, they are the carriers of contagious ideas that must not be allowed to spread. That's also one reason as to why a large number of books and movies get censored in a dictatorship.


They have, the following in common.

    1) They successfully instill an insane irratonal fear in those who would be thier subjects. They must NEVER let up, unease must ooze from them. The people must always wonder, “Am I next?”
    2) They must have parallel lines of terror. These lines must terrorize each other, as well as the subjects. They must also jostle for supremacy.
    3) The tyrant must have expanding and contracting circle of sycophants. The circle expands and contracts due to purges and additions.
    4) The tyrant must be convinced of his genius. Hitler served as a message runner in the trenches during the WW1 , Yet he thought himself to being a military genius.

    5) The tyrant must have instruments of coercion, i.e., secret police and prisons, known for torture and lingering death.
    6) He must have written books and/or phamplets that showcase his genius. Said writings must be required reading, and if need be memorized.


Dictators have in common arre:

Megalomania: They are narcissists and megalomaniacs. They cannot think beyond themselves and cannot value anybody or anyone’s opinion above themselves.
Oratory / Ability to mesmerise the masses: Hitler anfd Mussolini were fabulous rabble rouser who could sway thousands. 

A small coterie around them that keeps them divorced from reality as time passes. The coterie is often one that has profited from the dictator’s rule. It is in their interest to keep the Dictator happy. Which means shielding them from the truth of how much the people may despise them.

Dictators want it done their way, not necessarily like the law, courts or legislatures want it done. They also merge or control the legislative and judiciary with the executive branch of the government with force to ensure absolute control.

The dictators, their families, friends and supporters do much better than others during the dictatorship.
Dictators must use force, repression, propaganda and constant vigilance to preserve their dictatorships.

Dictators live in fear for their lives or are greatly concerned with their own safety and security.


Most of them come to a sticky endKarma is a bitch. Dictators either killed in an uprising  or by their own hand  or are forced to flee in exile. Not many cases of dictators being dealt with in International Courts.

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

La politica estera independente del Presidente Duterte

Centi di Teddy Casino
Pubblicato 16:00, 29 settembre 2016
Aggiornato 16:23, 29 settembre 2016
 Tradutto e ripubblicato da Belarmino D. Saguing 
Roma, 02 Nov. 2016

Perché è che, nel contesto delle Filippine, una politica estera indipendente è necessariamente antagonistica a Stati Uniti e i suoi interessi? 
Quando presidente Rodrigo Duterte dice Filippine non è uno stato vassallo della Stati Uniti d'America, o quando lui insiste che vuole perseguire una "politica estera indipendente", egli è in realtà riecheggiando un criterio sancito dalla costituzione filippina.
Il presidente Rodrigo Roa Duterte

Articolo II, Art. 7, della Costituzione afferma: "lo stato persegue una politica estera indipendente. Nelle sue relazioni con altri stati la considerazione fondamentale sarà sovranità nazionale, l'integrità territoriale, interesse nazionale e il diritto all'autodeterminazione."
È interessante notare che, nessun presidente filippino dal forse Manuel Luis Quezon, che ha detto che avrebbe piuttosto un paese gestito come l'inferno da filippini di una corsa come il cielo dagli americani, ha espresso l'aderenza a tale politica in termini così forte come Duterte.
Perché è che, nel contesto delle Filippine, una politica estera indipendente è necessariamente antagonistica a Stati Uniti e i suoi interessi? Una rapida lettura della storia mostra il perché.
Fin da quando gli americani ingannato Aguinaldo, Buencamino e Paterno et. altri nel 1898, gli Stati Uniti praticamente ha dettato il modo ci relazioniamo con esso e il resto del mondo. Questo fecero gli americani come nostri padroni coloniali dal 1902 al 1946 e come nostro neocoloniale burattinai dal 1946 ad oggi. Foto grafico di pres Duterte di soldati americani calpestare i cadaveri dei Moros nel massacro di Bud Dajo è solo la punta dell'iceberg di una storia lunga e brutale di dominio americano e l'intervento nei nostri affari.
Il massacro di Bud Dajo

Anche se gli Stati Uniti ci ha concesso l'indipendenza dopo la liberazione giapponese, ha fissato un involto di stringhe che legava il nostro sviluppo politico ed economico all'agenda imperialista dell'America (per esempio The Bell Trade Act, accordo di basi militari RP-USA, accordo di assistenza militare RP-USA, il trattato di difesa reciproca, tra gli altri.) Questa è stata seguita da accordi onerosi e dure imposizioni sotto guida USA agenzie multilaterali come il fondo monetario internazionale (FMI), Banca mondiale (WB) e l'accordo generale sulle tariffe doganali e sul commercio - organizzazione mondiale del commercio (GATT-OMC) che ha rafforzato il nostro neocoloniale politiche commerciali e di investimento, ci rende ancor più ostaggio di politica economica degli Stati Uniti.

Ferdinand Marcos portato servilismo US a un nuovo minimo da costringendo il nostro popolo una brutale dittatura fascista nel servizio dell'imperialismo statunitense. Così ha fatto gli Stati Uniti estendere il supporto pieno politico, militare ed economico al suo regime fino al sua cacciata nel 1986. Suo successore pres Corazon Aquino potrebbe avere, ma si rifiutò di, attuare una politica estera indipendente. Al contrario, ha promesso di pagare ogni centesimo di debito odioso Marcos alla banca americana, europea e giapponese e si oppose con veemenza abrogazione storico del Senato dell'accordo basi militari RP-USA nel 1991. Ha seguito fino in fondo il FMI e la condizionalità di WB e programmi di aggiustamento strutturale.
Più tardi il governo Ramos, attraverso l'accelerare crescita investimento finanziato dall'USAID e la liberalizzazione con progetto Equity (AGILE), smantellato qualunque tipo di supporto e protezione è stato lasciato per i produttori locali in ordine per NOI e altri investimenti esteri per espandere e dominare l'economia locale. Nella nostra ascensione all'OMC, negoziatori filippine erano solo troppo desiderosi di abbassare le nostre barriere commerciali a scapito dei nostri produttori locali, che fino ad ora non hanno mai pienamente recuperato dall'assalto della globalizzazione.
Nel 1999, il governo di Estrada ha permesso il ritorno degli Stati Uniti truppe militari sotto contratto forze visitando RP-US (VFA). Ciò è stata seguita dalla reciproca logistica e Supply accordo (MLSA) approvato sotto pres Arroyo e l'Enhanced difesa cooperazione accordo (EDCA) approvato sotto pres Aquino. Tutti insieme, questi accordi rendono ora possibile per gli Stati Uniti di installare una serie di strutture militari USA in tutto l'arcipelago per fungere da basi in avanti nel suo perno dell'Asia, inclusa la gioco di potere con la Cina.

Tagliare i legami con l'America 
Per riassumere, il nostro passato coloniale e presente neocoloniale hanno fatto le Filippine non solo un avamposto militare US nel sud-est asiatico ma una fonte di manodopera a basso costo e materie prime, un mercato stabile per i suoi prodotti e un sito di investimento redditizio per le imprese transnazionali. Tutto questo a scapito della sovranità nazionale e il nostro sviluppo come un'economia moderna, autosufficiente e industriale. Nessuna meraviglia che nonostante le nostre eccessivamente ricche risorse naturali e una popolazione altamente di talento, giovane e in crescita, restiamo un paese povero e sottosviluppato, scorrevole in stato dal numero di Asia 2 negli anni ' 50 per la proverbiale malato oggi.
È in questa luce che una politica estera indipendente diventa così importante. Tale politica deve necessariamente partono da decenni di programmi politici ed economici USA-imposto e ci aiutano a liberarsi dalla mentalità coloniale che ci ha colpito come una nazione.

Una politica estera indipendente significa tagliare i legami con l'America?
Solo un pazzo potrebbe pensare che. Ma sicuramente, richiede una ridefinizione tanto necessaria e lungo ritardata delle nostre relazioni "speciali" con gli Stati Uniti. Per nessun altro paese ha calpestato la nostra sovranità nazionale, l'integrità territoriale, interesse nazionale e il diritto di autodeterminazione, più che gli Stati Uniti d'America.Non in Spagna, non Giappone, nemmeno la Cina nonostante le sue azioni illegali e spregevole nel mare delle Filippine West.
Se Presidente Duterte è grave nel perseguire una politica estera indipendente, che vada oltre parlare male di Barack Obama o mostrando il dito medio dell'UE. Naturalmente a calci fuori delle truppe statunitensi da Mindanao e coinvolgente Cina in colloqui bilaterali nel mare delle Filippine West è un buon inizio.
Ma per essere veramente significativa, tale politica dovrà essere tradotta in azioni diplomatiche più audace e riforme politiche e socio-economiche profonde che tengono la nostra sovranità, l'integrità territoriale, interesse nazionale e diritto all'autodeterminazione sopra qualsiasi potenza straniera.
In questo contesto, chiediamo che l'USA e la UE media mainstream che essi, troppo, moderare i loro reportage e smettere di ritrarre come un mostro il nostro Presidente, il primo veramente Filippino nazionalistico e Pro-popolo Presidente.

Monday, September 19, 2016

A STRANGE WORLD OF DOUBLE-STANDARD SENSE OF JUSTICE

A STRANGE WORLD OF DOUBLE-STANDARD SENSE OF JUSTICE
Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 19 September 2016





A few days ago, I was questioned by an Italian about the by now ‘famous’ summary killings in my country. A very hard egg to break question because he is clearly thinking about President Duterte’s extra-judicial killings. I said nothing specific at that moment because I am not really sure what to say, so first thing I did when I reached home, is to open my computer to search the internet for facts.

And sure enough, what the internet shows are mostly EJKs under Duterte while the bigger slice under the administrations fro Marcos (who originated it) is hardly mentioned andis practically enclosed in parenthesis when mentioned. Exposing the truth remains a failing point to the mainstream media.

Extrajudicial killing is not explicitly defined in international law. Some broadly define it as a killing that is not sanctioned by the courts and done outside the legal system. The Philippine Supreme Court further refined this definition to also consider the political affiliation of the victim, the method of attack and alleged involvement of state agents.


The situation before Duterte

Salaries are low, with the past administrations turning its back on the farmers calling for higher wages. With the implementation of a program to add two additional years in secondary school and the rising cost of schooling, hundreds of thousands of students face the danger of not being able to continue schooling. Corruption is rampant in the government, with countless billions going into the pockets of government officials. Many of them are also from landed families themselves or have ties with corporate entities, making the Philippine government a platform for serving the interests of a chosen few.* Criminals, notably the illicit drug merchants, were free to perpetrate their criminal trade protected by powerful people in the government and uniformed services continue to get rich with their criminal ‘business’-  

With this much conflict and oppression in the Philippines, it would not be much of a wonder if criticism is abundant and social movements thrive in the country. Where there is oppression, there certainly will be resistance. Yet sadly, activists and their criticisms have been met by the government head-on with no less than bullets and blood. There was the incident a few months ago, well-known to the people but ignored by the streamline media of the massacre of farmers victims of El Nino phenomena, who were asking for government’s food subsidy  in Mindanao, who instead of assistance, were fronted by the police who shoot them indiscriminately killing and wounding many.


A Deadly Place for Human Rights Advocates

The Philippines is considered one of the most dangerous countries in the world to engage in human rights advocacy. Front Line Defenders, a global organization that protects human rights defenders, ranked the country the second most dangerous for human rights advocates. Global Witness, an international advocacy group fighting against environmental and human rights abuses, says it is the third-deadliest for environmental and Indigenous rights activists. Committee to Protect Journalists, which promotes press freedom and the right of journalists to report the news without reprisal worldwide, sees it as the fourth-most dangerous country for journalists. In 2015, the US State Department concluded in its yearly report that "the most significant human rights problem continued to be extrajudicial killings … undertaken by security forces" in the Philippines.*

Human rights lawyers, judges and prosecutors have also been victims of extrajudicial killings. From 1999 to 2014, some 114 lawyers, judges and prosecutors have been killed, according to the International Association of People's Lawyers. Of these, 36 died under Aquino's watch (mid-2010 to end 2014). That's an average of two lawyers, judges or prosecutors per month.

It isn't only activists, lawyers and judges who have become victims. Civil society organizations have also experienced attacks on their development workers. The list of development workers killed include William Geertman, a Dutch NGO executive who has been living in the Philippines since the 1970s and whose organization was active in providing disaster relief and humanitarian services to farmers. He was shot in the back inside his office's compound. Another much-publicized case was that of NGO executive Emerito Samarca. His organization implemented food security and alternative learning programs for Indigenous peoples in Mindanao. He was found hogtied and stabbed by paramilitary forces allegedly employed by the military.* Priests and religious people were also victims. Father Fausto Tentorio, lovingly called ‘Father Pops’ by parishioners, was killed in front of his Parish church witnessed by terrified people. Father Tentorio advocated indigenous people’s rights and a vocal critic of big foreign and local corporations who are usurping indigenous lands for big scale mining and plantations for export agro-products and illegal loggers.


The difference

While the extra-judicial killings in the past government administration were directed against people’s advocates wrongfully and maliciously tagged as “enemies of the State”, was done to preserve the corrupt status quo, the present government of President Duterte is targeting the real enemies of the the Philippine society. Extra-judicial killings is an indefensable human rights violation. We cannot give any excuse for it.

But it is also not right to criminalize a President for doing something his predecessors has omitted to do. The fight against the drug problem has been willfully and criminally neglected by the past administrations because it is lucrative for them or at least for their cronies too. In the past, the drug lords were also processed and put to prison. But they were left to their business by corrupt officials who receive big sums of money from the drug lords, so much so that the present authorities discovered drug-producing laboratories are operating inside the national penitentiary complete with an arsenal of fire arms and ammunition. It was found that the drug lords are held in luxurious cells and living like kings inside the prison. 

And critics were silent about it. 

Now, don’t we find it disconcerting that President Duterte is receiving barrage of criticisms for his drug wars while critics were silent in the past against the open violations of the laws by the corrupt officials of the past?

It is right to criticize what is wrong, but not to the extent of being unjust by numbing our minds to realities.



Truly, people has double standard in judging things.

###





*Analisys- The Killing Fields: Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines By Mark Ambay, Truthout | News Analysis

Saturday, June 25, 2016

The Three bloodstained regimes of the Philippine

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 25 June 2016




Marcos Administration (1965 - 1986)

On 21 September 1972, then President Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law in the Philippines. Marcos gave the armed forces the power to "prevent or suppress… any act of insurrection or rebellion" which compromised the people's rights.  A total of 398 disappearances, 1,388 extrajudicial killings, and 1,499 killed or wounded in massacres were recorded but not every victim was accounted for.
After the declaration of Martial Law, Marcos issued six (6) general orders and an instruction to close privately owned media facilities. The Press Secretary, Francisco Tatad, and Secretary for National Defense, Juan Ponce Enrile, were ordered by Marcos "to take over and control or cause the taking over and control of all such newspapers, magazines, radio and television facilities and all other media communications... The information released to the public was highly censored and prevented journalists from releasing any suspicious information about the administration. Failure to abide would lead to arrest.
The assassination of Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino triggered the peaceful 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution, led by Aquino's wife, Corazon "Cory" Aquino. The peaceful revolution united the nation in a call against Marcos to uphold their human rights. It led to the abolition of Martial Law, the exile of the Marcos family, as well as Cory Aquino's rise to the presidency.

Arroyo Administration (2001 - 2010)

The Arroyo Administration was riddled by its several issues on several forms of violations against human rights. Most of these which include the increase in military power and presence, especially in Muslim Mindanao.  Philip Alston, a UN Rapporteur, published Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right To Development on 2008 that chronicled and reported the situation he had found while in the Philippines. Many incidents of extrajudicial killings were linked to this report, most notable of which is Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao, who was a direct testimony of the abuses concerning the military.

 

The Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao Murder

Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao was a peasant organizer in Salay, Misamis Oriental.  She was the chairman of the Misamis Oriental Farmers Organization and the coordinator of the party list group called  Bayan Muna. She was also an outspoken critic of the actions the Citizens' Armed Force Geographical Unit or CAFGU, and how they disrupt the relatively peaceful communities in Misamis Oriental. Philip Alston was a UN Rapporteur, who had Gandinao as a testimony to the extrajudicial killings, and other violations of human rights the military was practicing, whether it was the military is contested by the Military.  The Alston report was published on 2008, which highlighted these abuses through the United Nations General Assembly.  On the March 2007, however, Gandinao, together with her husband and daughter, was walking home after a day of doing farm work. Gandinao was then shot four times by two men on a motorcycle heading towards a nearby military camp, while Gandinao's family helplessly watched the attack  The local officials and passers-by all told Gandinao's husband and daughter that they were too busy to tend to the bleeding Gandinao  According to reports, after two hours of bleeding profusely, the assailants went back to the scene of the crime and even watched the entire ordeal of Gandinao. Her husband had to carry her to the Cagayan de Oro ambulance, which took another hour to get to the actual hospital. In the Cagayan de Oro hospital, Gandinao was pronounced dead on arrival

Vigilantism and Death Squad

According to the Alston report, the presence of "vigilantism" and Death Squad in Davao has been a commonplace occurrence, and has been going on for some time now, prior to his visit in the Philippines from 2006 to 2007.  The Death Squad, however, operate with no intention of hiding their identities, and in broad daylight. Davao Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has held office, aside from a brief stint as a congressman, since 1988. Rodrigo Duterte is known for his strict, anti-criminal approach in governing Davao City. However, in the same report, Rodrigo Duterte has admitted that hundreds of unsolved murders were committed during his time as mayor, and that he takes for "full responsibility" of it.  When Duterte was first elected as mayor, he faced a Davao with problems like rampant youth gangs, the New Peoples' Army (NPA) killing policemen routinely, and crime  The Davao Death Squad (DDS) has had over 500 victims since 1998; killing targets in public and in broad daylight  These executions were a response to petty crimes, and targets are sent warnings explaining why they are targeted by the DDS  It was, however, noted that during Duterte's term as mayor, criminal activity has decreased significantly. It should also be noted, however, that there are hundreds of unsolved murders.\

Benigno Aquino Administration (2010 – 2016

On 30 June 2010, Benigno Aquino III was sworn into office as the President of the Philippines  Notable acts during his term include the implementation of the K-12 program, the revocation of midnight appointments, the founding of the Philippine Truth Commission, the creation of agencies such as the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), and the framing of the Bangsamoro Basic Law. The administration vowed to eradicate corruption within the government system, but has yet to resolve such cases as those regarding Hacienda Luisita  and the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) scam. Listed below are the cases of human rights violations under the second Aquino administration:

 


Lumad Killings

The Lumads are people from various ethnic groups in Mindanao island. Residing in their ancestral lands
 they are often evicted and displaced due to the Moro people's claim on the same territory The Lumads have lost parts of their ancestral land due to a failure to understand the modern land tenure system.  To counter this, the Lumads established schools in their communities, supplying essential knowledge for the tribe members that would protect their rights, property and culture.  However, the Lumad communities are located in mountains that are distant from urban areas. These areas are also the location sites of armed conflictbetween the New People's Army (NPA) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). Caught in the conflict, the Lumad people's education, property, and security are endangered because of the increasing amount of military activity by the armed parties. ] Increasing military activity have eventually led to the displacement of the communities to shelter sites. Anxiety continues to grow among the Lumads with the escalation of armed conflict and detainment of community leaders (tribe leaders and teachers) labelled as rebels by the military  Alternative schools within the communities (aided by NGOs and universities) face concerns of closing down or demolition of their property, with some buildings converted by the military for their use  Lumad leaders and tribesmen, having experienced political detention due to false suspicions as well as the displacement of their tribes from their areas, have demanded respect for their human rights.
In response to the killing, detention, and displacement of members of their tribes, the Lumads have organized groups to gain the public's attention, calling for the halt of militarization in their communities. Students, religious leaders, and human rights advocates have supported the Lumads in their movement against the militarization. Activities held to support the Lumad movements have included concerts, cultural festivals (focusing on ethnic culture), and commemoration of Lumad leaders killed in the conflict. Activity leaders have included Fr. Fausto Tentorio, Fr. Tullio Favali, and Fr. Salvatore Carzedda  Groups like the Manilakbayan 2015 supported the movements through recruitment and the handing out of national situationers to students to spread awareness about the Lumads' dilemma The Philippines' Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has been investigating the incidents in regard to the 2015 murder of Lumad leaders and a school official by aparamilitary group called Magahat/Bagani  (in line with the idea of CAFGU) created by the AFP to hunt for NPA members. The AFP denies the allegation and attributes the killings to tribal conflict  However, the AFP has admitted that CAFGU has Lumad recruits within its ranks while asserting that the NPA has also recruited Lumads for the group  There is also delay of a decision on the CHR investigation due to the noncooperation of the Lumad group after the interruption of the investigation by the spokesman of Kalumaran Mindanao, Kerlan Fanagel. Fanagel insists that the group need not have another 'false' dialogue with the CHR since CHR has yet to present the results/findings of the investigations from the past months when Lumad leaders were killed. Because of the lack of data, CHR decided to postpone the presentation of their initial report to the second week of December 2015.

Political prisoners

Political prisoners are people arrested because of their opposition towards the current Aquino government; they are seen as 'enemies of the state' and are imprisoned upon arrest. As recorded by the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) and the Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) in September 2014, 840 political prisoners were held in detention cells and prisons. To promote human rights, the government has permitted access to international humanitarian organizations and have granted pardon, parole, and amnesty programs based on NGOs' lists

Journalist killings

The number of journalist killings under the Aquino administration has been noted to be the highest since 1986.  Because of this, the Philippines has been ranked by CNN as the third deadliest country for journalists,  Information about disappearances and murders of reporters are kept from the public, making several agencies/organizations as well as whistleblowers at risk of exposure to harm. Some of the well-known journalists killed in their line of work during the Aquino government include: Henry Araneta, Desidario Camangyan, Joselito Agustin, Gerardo Ortega, Romeo Olea, Christopher Guarin, Mario Sy, Fernando Solijon, Joas Dignos, and Rubylita Garcia.  According to the 2014 Human Rights Watch Report, only 6 out of 26 cases managed to identify/capture their suspects.
The Aquino administration implemented reforms towards more effective criminal investigation procedures, in addition to passing laws to better uphold human rights. However, these reforms are underdeveloped. An example is Administration Order 35, which acquired problems in identifying which case to pursue due to the process requirements

 

Source: Human rights in the Philippines  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Philippines#Arroyo_Administration_.282001_-_2010.29







###