Saturday, June 25, 2016

The Three bloodstained regimes of the Philippine

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 25 June 2016




Marcos Administration (1965 - 1986)

On 21 September 1972, then President Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law in the Philippines. Marcos gave the armed forces the power to "prevent or suppress… any act of insurrection or rebellion" which compromised the people's rights.  A total of 398 disappearances, 1,388 extrajudicial killings, and 1,499 killed or wounded in massacres were recorded but not every victim was accounted for.
After the declaration of Martial Law, Marcos issued six (6) general orders and an instruction to close privately owned media facilities. The Press Secretary, Francisco Tatad, and Secretary for National Defense, Juan Ponce Enrile, were ordered by Marcos "to take over and control or cause the taking over and control of all such newspapers, magazines, radio and television facilities and all other media communications... The information released to the public was highly censored and prevented journalists from releasing any suspicious information about the administration. Failure to abide would lead to arrest.
The assassination of Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino triggered the peaceful 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution, led by Aquino's wife, Corazon "Cory" Aquino. The peaceful revolution united the nation in a call against Marcos to uphold their human rights. It led to the abolition of Martial Law, the exile of the Marcos family, as well as Cory Aquino's rise to the presidency.

Arroyo Administration (2001 - 2010)

The Arroyo Administration was riddled by its several issues on several forms of violations against human rights. Most of these which include the increase in military power and presence, especially in Muslim Mindanao.  Philip Alston, a UN Rapporteur, published Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, including the Right To Development on 2008 that chronicled and reported the situation he had found while in the Philippines. Many incidents of extrajudicial killings were linked to this report, most notable of which is Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao, who was a direct testimony of the abuses concerning the military.

 

The Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao Murder

Sichi Bustamante-Gandinao was a peasant organizer in Salay, Misamis Oriental.  She was the chairman of the Misamis Oriental Farmers Organization and the coordinator of the party list group called  Bayan Muna. She was also an outspoken critic of the actions the Citizens' Armed Force Geographical Unit or CAFGU, and how they disrupt the relatively peaceful communities in Misamis Oriental. Philip Alston was a UN Rapporteur, who had Gandinao as a testimony to the extrajudicial killings, and other violations of human rights the military was practicing, whether it was the military is contested by the Military.  The Alston report was published on 2008, which highlighted these abuses through the United Nations General Assembly.  On the March 2007, however, Gandinao, together with her husband and daughter, was walking home after a day of doing farm work. Gandinao was then shot four times by two men on a motorcycle heading towards a nearby military camp, while Gandinao's family helplessly watched the attack  The local officials and passers-by all told Gandinao's husband and daughter that they were too busy to tend to the bleeding Gandinao  According to reports, after two hours of bleeding profusely, the assailants went back to the scene of the crime and even watched the entire ordeal of Gandinao. Her husband had to carry her to the Cagayan de Oro ambulance, which took another hour to get to the actual hospital. In the Cagayan de Oro hospital, Gandinao was pronounced dead on arrival

Vigilantism and Death Squad

According to the Alston report, the presence of "vigilantism" and Death Squad in Davao has been a commonplace occurrence, and has been going on for some time now, prior to his visit in the Philippines from 2006 to 2007.  The Death Squad, however, operate with no intention of hiding their identities, and in broad daylight. Davao Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has held office, aside from a brief stint as a congressman, since 1988. Rodrigo Duterte is known for his strict, anti-criminal approach in governing Davao City. However, in the same report, Rodrigo Duterte has admitted that hundreds of unsolved murders were committed during his time as mayor, and that he takes for "full responsibility" of it.  When Duterte was first elected as mayor, he faced a Davao with problems like rampant youth gangs, the New Peoples' Army (NPA) killing policemen routinely, and crime  The Davao Death Squad (DDS) has had over 500 victims since 1998; killing targets in public and in broad daylight  These executions were a response to petty crimes, and targets are sent warnings explaining why they are targeted by the DDS  It was, however, noted that during Duterte's term as mayor, criminal activity has decreased significantly. It should also be noted, however, that there are hundreds of unsolved murders.\

Benigno Aquino Administration (2010 – 2016

On 30 June 2010, Benigno Aquino III was sworn into office as the President of the Philippines  Notable acts during his term include the implementation of the K-12 program, the revocation of midnight appointments, the founding of the Philippine Truth Commission, the creation of agencies such as the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), and the framing of the Bangsamoro Basic Law. The administration vowed to eradicate corruption within the government system, but has yet to resolve such cases as those regarding Hacienda Luisita  and the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) scam. Listed below are the cases of human rights violations under the second Aquino administration:

 


Lumad Killings

The Lumads are people from various ethnic groups in Mindanao island. Residing in their ancestral lands
 they are often evicted and displaced due to the Moro people's claim on the same territory The Lumads have lost parts of their ancestral land due to a failure to understand the modern land tenure system.  To counter this, the Lumads established schools in their communities, supplying essential knowledge for the tribe members that would protect their rights, property and culture.  However, the Lumad communities are located in mountains that are distant from urban areas. These areas are also the location sites of armed conflictbetween the New People's Army (NPA) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). Caught in the conflict, the Lumad people's education, property, and security are endangered because of the increasing amount of military activity by the armed parties. ] Increasing military activity have eventually led to the displacement of the communities to shelter sites. Anxiety continues to grow among the Lumads with the escalation of armed conflict and detainment of community leaders (tribe leaders and teachers) labelled as rebels by the military  Alternative schools within the communities (aided by NGOs and universities) face concerns of closing down or demolition of their property, with some buildings converted by the military for their use  Lumad leaders and tribesmen, having experienced political detention due to false suspicions as well as the displacement of their tribes from their areas, have demanded respect for their human rights.
In response to the killing, detention, and displacement of members of their tribes, the Lumads have organized groups to gain the public's attention, calling for the halt of militarization in their communities. Students, religious leaders, and human rights advocates have supported the Lumads in their movement against the militarization. Activities held to support the Lumad movements have included concerts, cultural festivals (focusing on ethnic culture), and commemoration of Lumad leaders killed in the conflict. Activity leaders have included Fr. Fausto Tentorio, Fr. Tullio Favali, and Fr. Salvatore Carzedda  Groups like the Manilakbayan 2015 supported the movements through recruitment and the handing out of national situationers to students to spread awareness about the Lumads' dilemma The Philippines' Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has been investigating the incidents in regard to the 2015 murder of Lumad leaders and a school official by aparamilitary group called Magahat/Bagani  (in line with the idea of CAFGU) created by the AFP to hunt for NPA members. The AFP denies the allegation and attributes the killings to tribal conflict  However, the AFP has admitted that CAFGU has Lumad recruits within its ranks while asserting that the NPA has also recruited Lumads for the group  There is also delay of a decision on the CHR investigation due to the noncooperation of the Lumad group after the interruption of the investigation by the spokesman of Kalumaran Mindanao, Kerlan Fanagel. Fanagel insists that the group need not have another 'false' dialogue with the CHR since CHR has yet to present the results/findings of the investigations from the past months when Lumad leaders were killed. Because of the lack of data, CHR decided to postpone the presentation of their initial report to the second week of December 2015.

Political prisoners

Political prisoners are people arrested because of their opposition towards the current Aquino government; they are seen as 'enemies of the state' and are imprisoned upon arrest. As recorded by the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) and the Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) in September 2014, 840 political prisoners were held in detention cells and prisons. To promote human rights, the government has permitted access to international humanitarian organizations and have granted pardon, parole, and amnesty programs based on NGOs' lists

Journalist killings

The number of journalist killings under the Aquino administration has been noted to be the highest since 1986.  Because of this, the Philippines has been ranked by CNN as the third deadliest country for journalists,  Information about disappearances and murders of reporters are kept from the public, making several agencies/organizations as well as whistleblowers at risk of exposure to harm. Some of the well-known journalists killed in their line of work during the Aquino government include: Henry Araneta, Desidario Camangyan, Joselito Agustin, Gerardo Ortega, Romeo Olea, Christopher Guarin, Mario Sy, Fernando Solijon, Joas Dignos, and Rubylita Garcia.  According to the 2014 Human Rights Watch Report, only 6 out of 26 cases managed to identify/capture their suspects.
The Aquino administration implemented reforms towards more effective criminal investigation procedures, in addition to passing laws to better uphold human rights. However, these reforms are underdeveloped. An example is Administration Order 35, which acquired problems in identifying which case to pursue due to the process requirements

 

Source: Human rights in the Philippines  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Philippines#Arroyo_Administration_.282001_-_2010.29







###

Friday, December 4, 2015

Noy’s Rome mis-adventure with OFWs

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 4 December 2015


Noy’s Rome mis-adventure with OFWs




There are people who are wondering about what Pres. Aquino has accomplished in his visit with OFWs in Rome. Can he call it a success? Many OFWs considered his Rome ‘adventure’ a dismal failure. He only succeeded in projecting himself a clown masquerading as a national leader and someone who could speak so much words without saying anything.

His speech before us in his meeting with AFWs, he spoke at length about the successes of his administration… economic growth, and upgrading of youth education with his K+12 program. He boasted about his health program and the progress on tourist industry, his war against crime and corruption.

But we already heard it many times before.  And we also knew that his so-called economic progress is empty because it has’nt reached the ordinary people. We have already seen that his K+12 program is not really projected to upgrade the education in the country, it only serve as a factory for more migrant workers. His health program is a sham. Orfinary people could still ill afford the prohibitive cost of medicine and hospitals which has been privatized. Crime still abound and curroption still destroy our economy and political system.

It is not what we expected from the president. To our dismay, he never made mention on what he accomplished for us OFWs. We wanted to hear about legal assistance for OFWs, lightening the burden of excessive fees, lessening of bureaucratic hardships each and every OFW before, during and after their sojourn in far awa lands. We want to hear from hin what steps he has done in industrialization and genuine agrarian reforms that would give the Filipinos jobs and income to enable them to live a decvent human life without having to migrate. About the end of Labor Export Progran tha gives a deathblow to many families.

Above all, we expected him to tell us abouth the stopping of endless human rights violations and persecution of peoples leaders and activists. The killing of Lumad and other indigenous people of the Philippines.

He came to Europe this time to participate in the talks on climate change. But has he the right presence of mind when he boasted on his programs to minimize the effects of pollution, when he himself support the use of polluting fuels like carbon to produce power in our country? His open invitation to foreign entities to destroy the environment of the country through destructive large-scale mining that plunders our natural wealth and displace the indigenous people? If this president believed that he has been doing well in this field, then he is either telling himself leas or is a hippocrite.
The president’s meeting with the OFWs in Rome is a failure. It only succeeded in projecting himself as a clown. He succeeded to amuse us and make us laugh with his sdenseless anecdotes about himself being a bachelor president. But laughing does not mean we arre happy about him. We are dismayed, we are disgusted. Truly he is the clown who could speak may words without saying anything.

 Noy’s Rome mis-adventure with OFWs

There are people who are wondering about what Pres. Aquino has accomplished in his visit with OFWs in Rome. Can he call it a success? Many OFWs considered his Rome ‘adventure’ a dismal failure. He only succeeded in projecting himself a clown masquerading as a national leade and someone who could speak so much words without saying anything.
His speech before us in his meeting with AFWs, he spoke at length about the successes of his administration… economic growth, and upgrading of youth education with his K+12 program. He boasted about his health program and the progress on tourist industry, his war against crime and corruption.

But we already heard it many times before.  And we also knew that his so-called economic progress is empty because it has’nt reached the ordinary people. We have already seen that his K+12 program is not really projected to upgrade the education in the country, it only serve as a factory for more migrant workers. His health program is a sham. Orfinary people could still ill afford the prohibitive cost of medicine and hospitals which has been privatized. Crime still abound and curroption still destroy our economy and political system.

It is not what we expected from the president. To our dismay, he never made mention on what he accomplished for us OFWs. We wanted to hear about legal assistance for OFWs, lightening the burden of excessive fees, lessening of bureaucratic hardships each and every OFW before, during and after their sojourn in far awa lands. We want to hear from hin what steps he has done in industrialization and genuine agrarian reforms that would give the Filipinos jobs and income to enable them to live a decvent human life without having to migrate. About the end of Labor Export Progran tha gives a deathblow to many families.
Above all, we expected him to tell us abouth the stopping of endless human rights violations and persecution of peoples leaders and activists. The killing of Lumad and other indigenous people of the Philippines.

He came to Europe this time to participate in the talks on climate change. But has he the right presence of mind when he boasted on his programs to minimize the effects of pollution, when he himself support the use of polluting fuels like carbon to produce power in our country? His open invitation to foreign entities to destroy the environment of the country through destructive large-scale mining that plunders our natural wealth and displace the indigenous people? If this president believed that he has been doing well in this field, then he is either telling himself leas or is a hipocrite.



The president’s meeting with the OFWs in Rome is a failure. It only succeeded in projecting himself as a clown. He succeeded to amuse us and make us laugh with his senseless anecdotes about himself being a bachelor president. But laughing does not mean we are happy about him. We were dismayed, we were disgusted. Truly he is the clown who could speak much words without saying anything.

Monday, November 2, 2015

Mindanao: A Militarized and Plundered Land

Mindanao:
A Militarized and Plundered Land
Source : www.manilakbayan.org

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy 02 November 2015






Attacks on
Schools

Indigenous community schools in Mindanao have been targeted for closure, encampment, vilification, and harassments. These schools have been initiated by Lumad community organizations, with assistance from non-government organizations and support groups, in response to the need to address high illiteracy rates in rural areas. Since April 2015, Lumad children of Talaingod in Southern Mindanao have been holding classes in an evacuation center after their  schools were ordered closed and after soldiers have encamped in their communities. The same experience of attacks prevails among Manobo, Banwaon, and Mamanwa children in Caraga; Blaan and Tboli children in Socsksargen region; and Higaonon and Manobo children in Northern Mindanao


Attacks
on our
Communities


Militarization of communities has led to forcible evacuations of Lumads. Their livelihood has been disrupted. Community infrastructure like schools, clinics, collective farms have been destroyed. Using the classic divide-and-rule approach, the AFP has organized, armed, and trained indigenous para-militaries to fight against their kin.


Attacks on our People

Advocates against big mining, plantations, and other extractive  projects, as well as teachers and students, have been lodged with fabricated criminal suits. They are facing threats to their lives.n Several of those who find their names in the AFP’s “order of battle hit list” have become victims of summary executions.


Support
our Calls

Stop Oplan Bayanihan, the Aquino government’s war against the people No to Big Mining and Plantations!
Cancel all mining permits! Stop plantation expansion!
Stop the Attacks on our Schools!
Pull out military troops from our schools and communities!
Rescind Department of Education Memorandum 221 or the
militarization of schools!
Stop the Attacks on our Communities!
Disband all indigenous paramilitaries!
Indemnify rural communities displaced by militarization!
Stop militarization in rural and urban communities!
Stop the Attacks on our People!
Justice for all victims of extra- judicial killings by the Aquino government!
Drop false criminal charges against our community and sectoral leaders!


DEFEND MINDANAO
FROM MILITARIZATION AND PLUNDER!

Support
Manilakbayan
2015

We in Mindanao are fighting to defend our schools, communities, and people from militarization and plunder.
Manilakbayan 2015 is a people’s caravan from Mindanao to Manila, to bring the voices of indigenous peoples and peasant communities to the national capital.
At the doorstep of the Presidential Palace and before the national platform, we vow to demand justice for victims of  extrajudicial killings, to demand the dropping of false charges against our leaders and people, to press for the pull out of military troops from our schools and communities, and to clamor for the disbandment and disarming of paramilitaries. Manilakbayan 2015 needs the participation of the people in Manila and the solidarity of peoples all over the world.Mindanao needs your active support!


How you can help

JOIN the Manilakbayan from Mindanao to Manila

WRITE letters to government agencies and international bodies to call attention to our plight

EDUCATEyour community/group about the situation in Mindanao and our calls for justice

MOBILIZEa demonstration, media event or any gathering on the Global Week of Action for Mindanao on December 3-9, 2015

DONATE and support the cause for human rights and ecological justice


T: +63 82 327 2719
E: support.manilakbayan@gmail.com
W: www.manilakbayan.org
FB: manilakbayan ng Mindanao
Contact Us



Sunday, August 30, 2015

ANDRES BONIFACIO: The Controversial Hero of the Philippine Revolution

Posted by Belarmino Dabalos Saguing
Rome, Italy August 30, 2015






The historical assessment of Bonifacio involves several controversial points. His death is alternately viewed as a justified execution for treason and a "legal murder" fueled by politics. Some historians consider him to be the rightful first President of the Philippines instead of Aguinaldo. Some historians have also called that Bonifacio share or even take the place of José Rizal as the (foremost) Philippine national hero.


Andrés Bonifacio y de Castro (November 30, 1863 – May 10, 1897) was a Filipino nationalist and revolutionary leader. He is often called "the Father of the Philippine Revolution". He was a founder and later Supremo ("supreme leader") of the Kataas-taasan, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan or simply and more popularly called Katipunan, a movement which sought the independence of the Philippines from Spanish colonial rule and started the Philippine Revolution. He is considered a de facto national hero of the Philippines, and is also considered by some Filipino historians to be the first President of the Philippines (through the revolutionary government he established), but officially he is not recognized as such.


In 1892 Bonifacio was one of the founding members of Rizal's La Liga Filipina, an organization which called for political reforms in Spain's colonial government of the Philippines. However, La Liga disbanded after only one meeting as Rizal was arrested and deported to Dapitan in Mindanao. Bonifacio, Apolinario Mabini and others revived La Liga in Rizal's absence and Bonifacio was active at organizing local chapters in Manila. He would become the chief propagandist of the revived Liga.


La Liga Filipina contributed moral and financial support to the Propaganda Movement of Filipino reformists in Spain.


Andrés Bonifacio was also a member of Freemasonry with the lodge Taliba headed by Jose Dizon; and his pseudonym was Sinukuan, possibly taken from a Philippine mythological character Maria Sinukuan.


 On the night of July 7, 1892, the day after Rizal's deportation was announced, Bonifacio and others officially "founded" the Katipunan, or in full, Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang  Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan ("Highest and Most Respected Society of the Country's Children;" Bayan can also denote community, people, and nation).  The secret society sought independence from Spain through armed revolt.


From the beginning, Bonifacio was one of the chief Katipunan officers, although he did not become its Supremo (supreme leader) or Presidente Supremo (Supreme President)  until 1895. He was the third head of the Katipunan after Deodato Arellano and Román Basa. Prior to this, he served as the society's comptroller and then as its fiscal.  The society had its own laws, bureaucratic structure and elective leadership. For each province involved, the Katipunan Supreme Council coordinated with provincial councils in charge of public administration and military affairs, and with local councils in charge of affairs on the district or barrio level.


Within the society, Bonifacio developed a strong friendship with Emilio Jacinto, who served as his adviser and confidant, as well as a member of the Supreme Council. Bonifacio adopted Jacinto's Kartilya primer as the official teachings of the society in place of his own Decalogue, which he judged as inferior. Bonifacio, Jacinto and Pío Valenzuela collaborated on the society's organ, Kalayaan (Freedom), which had only one printed issue. Bonifacio wrote several pieces for the paper, including the poem Pag-ibig sa Tinubúang Lupà (approx. "Love for One's Homeland) under the pseudonym Agapito Bagumbayan. The publication of Kalayaan in March 1896 led to a great increase in the society's membership. The Katipunan movement spread throughout Luzon

to Panay in the Visayas and even as far as Mindanao.  From less than 300 members in January 1896,  it had 30,000 to 40,000 by August 1896.


The rapid increase in Katipunan activity drew the suspicion of the Spanish authorities. By early 1896, Spanish intelligence was aware of the existence of a seditious secret society, and suspects were kept under surveillance and arrests were made. On 3 May, Bonifacio held a general assembly of Katipunan leaders in Pasig, where they debated when to start the revolution. While some officers, especially Bonifacio, believed a revolution was inevitable, some members, especially Santiago Alvarez and Emilio Aguinaldoboth of Cavite, expressed reservations and disagreement regarding the planned revolt due to lack of firearms. The consensus was to consult José Rizal in Dapitan before launching armed action, so Bonifacio sent Pío Valenzuela to Rizal. Rizal turned out to be against the revolution, believing it to be premature, He recommended more preparation, but suggested that, in the event the revolution did break out, they should seek the leadership of Antonio Luna, who was widely regarded as a brilliant military leader.


Eluding an intensive manhunt, Bonifacio called thousands of Katipunan members to a mass gathering in Caloocan, where they decided to start their uprising. The event, marked by the tearing of cedulas (community tax certificates) was later called the "Cry of Balintawak" or "Cry of Pugad Lawin"; the exact location and date of the Cry are disputed.  The Supreme Council of the Katipunan declared a nationwide armed revolution against Spain and called for a simultaneous coordinated attack on the capitalManila on August 29. Bonifacio appointed generals to lead rebel forces to Manila. Other Katipunan councils were also informed of their plans. Before hostilities erupted, Bonifacio reorganized the Katipunan into an open de facto revolutionary government and they named the nation and its government Haring Bayang Katagalugan (loosely translates to Tagalog Republic), with him as President and commander-in-chief (or generalissimo) of the rebel army and the Supreme Council as his cabinet. On August 28, Bonifacio issued the following general proclamation:


This manifesto is for all of you. It is absolutely necessary for us to stop at the earliest possible time the nameless oppositions being perpetrated on the sons of the country who are now suffering the brutal punishment and tortures in jails, and because of this please let all the brethren know that on Saturday, the 29th of the current month, the revolution shall commence according to our agreement. For this purpose, it is necessary for all towns to rise simultaneously and attack Manila at the same time. Anybody who obstructs this sacred ideal of the people will be considered a traitor and an enemy, except if he is ill; or is not physically fit, in which case he shall be tried according to the regulations we have put in force. Mount of Liberty, 28 August 1896 – ANDRÉS BONIFACIO


Some historians such as Milagros Guerrero, Emmanuel Encarnación, and Ramón Villegas have pushed for the recognition of Bonifacio as the first President of the Philippines instead of Aguinaldo, the officially recognized one. This view is based on his position of President/Supremo of the Katipunan revolutionary government from 1896–97. This view also emphasizes that Bonifacio established a government through the Katipunan before a government headed by Aguinaldo was formed at the Tejeros Convention. Guerrero writes that Bonifacio had a concept of the Philippine nation called Haring Bayang Katagalugan ("Sovereign Tagalog Nation") which was displaced by Aguinaldo's concept ofFilipinas. In documents predating Tejeros and the First Philippine Republic, Bonifacio is called the president of the "Tagalog Republic".


The term Tagalog historically refers to an ethnic group, their language, and script. While historians have thus tended to view Bonifacio's concept of the Philippine nation as restricted to the Tagalog regions of Luzon, as compared to Aguinaldo's view of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (comprising the modern Philippines), Guerrero writes that Bonifacio and the Katipunan in fact already had an all-encompassing view. The Kartilya defines "tagalog" as "all those born in this archipelago; therefore, though visayan,ilocano, pampango, etc. they are all tagalogs".


José Rizal is generally considered the national hero, but Bonifacio has been suggested as a more worthy candidate on the grounds of having started the Philippine Revolution. Teodoro Agoncillo notes that the Philippine national hero, unlike those of other countries, is not "the leader of its liberation forces".  Renato Constantino writes that Rizal is a "United States-sponsored hero" who was promoted as the greatest Filipino hero during the American colonial period of the Philippines – after Aguinaldo lost the Philippine–American War. The United States promoted Rizal, who was taken to represent peaceful political advocacy, instead of more radical figures whose ideas could inspire resistance against American rule.  Specifically, Rizal was selected over Bonifacio who was viewed as "too radical" and Apolinario Mabini who was "unregenerate."
Historian Ambeth Ocampo gives the opinion that arguing for Bonifacio as the "better" hero on the grounds that he, not Rizal, began the Philippine Revolution, is moot since Rizal inspired Bonifacio, the Katipunan, and the Revolution. Even prior to Rizal's banishment to Dapitan, he was already regarded by the Filipino people as a national hero, having been elected as honorary president by the Katipunan.  León María Guerrero notes that while Rizal did not give his blessing to the Katipunan because he believed the time was premature, he did not condemn the aim of independence per se. Teodoro Agoncillo gives the opinion that Bonifacio should not replace Rizal as national hero, but they should be honored "side by side"


Despite popular recognition of Rizal as "the Philippine national hero", the title itself has no explicit legal definition in present Philippine law. Rizal and Bonifacio, however, are given the implied recognition of being national heroes because they are commemorated annually nationwide  Rizal Day on December 30 and Bonifacio Day on November 30.  According to the website of the National Center for Culture and the Arts:


Despite the lack of any official declaration explicitly proclaiming them as national heroes, [Rizal and Bonifacio] remain admired and revered for their roles in Philippine history. Heroes, according to historians, should not be legislated.


Their appreciation should be better left to academics. Acclamation for heroes, they felt, would be recognition enough.








.